Herbert Rowse Armstrong. Dr Thomas E. Hinck* During tho time you wore treating tho eawo, or any of tho time you were treating tho case, was tho pomm HulYoring from vomiting?—No, I cannot roxnombor it. Juwt Ihiult?—If you mention tho symptoinw 1 can (.till. Neuritis symptoms, you «aid il—YON. And you do not know how long boforo you «a\v that pationt the arsenic had been taken?—No, I do not know at all. 1 know if in tho course of my attendance on any pornon I havo HUN- picion that there has boon foul play and that pwnon diow, 1 havo to inform tho coroner or the police. By Mr. JUSTICE DAHLINU—If you miHpociod foul play, whothor the patient died or not, you would toll tho police, would you not?— Not unless I had sufficient evidence. Cross-examination continues/- Quito right; you would go during life, but if on reconsideration you formed the opinion at the time of death that there had been during (,h<» oourwo of thai: person's illness anything in tho nature of foul play-—you undw« stand what I mean by that—yon would tmdotibl'odly, I am Hiiro> either inform tho police or tho coroner?—I nliould, During Mh*w. Armstrong's life, and at tho timo aho dind, thorn waH nothing in any of her symptoms that wcro not conMisleni; in my opinion wiih natural causes, so far as I know theun at thn titno. Of course I am not dealing with what yon know now, During the whole course of tho time you woro attending her, right up to and including her death, thero wan nothing, was tlwro, that you could see which was inconsistent with natural tiatiHON?—-No, Otherwise you would not havo givoti a eortiflcato? -1 nlumld not have given a certificate. Tho eortifioalti I gave WHH divided into three partfi. The first thing I oortilled hw death from was heart disease- I formed tho opinion i.luit Mi at. heart diwutMO hftd been caused by a long course of rheuwatiNitu Before I formed that opinion and put it down as part of tho doath eortifieat-o T was satisfied in my own mind that tharo wan a mirthutmti history of rheumatism to account for her heart dfawiHft, The noxt thing was nephritis, Ftix monthst. T formed (hat opinion aw (ho rcwtilt of my examination of Mrs. ArmHtrong boforo H!I^ wont to Barn- wood, and my examination of her whon nlw roiunmd, wbwn I found albumen present. If thcro was wittioHuit rhmtmatiwrn to account for heart disease, tho heart diflonno woiild nc-oount for the nephritis. The acute gastritis T put down a» tw^nty-ona days. The acute gastritis was, in rny opinion, afe that timo following on the heart disease due to kidney trcmbto. <* So it all goes back to the heart diflea*m oauwod by a Ioti# period of rheumatism which you BatiHfied yonrsolf wa« sufficient for the heart disease 1—There was no other evidence. But there was that evidence ?~Thera -was that evidence. I was told that Mrs. Armstrong mifforod from rhmimatism from 1915 to 1918. I was not given any of tho details such an wo got 92